Follow the accounting entanglement trail $659 trail and you will run into the $518,903 disappears trail.
That is why the $659 trail is not recognized and why I was removed as Trustee.

The only protection families have against these accounting fraudsters is for every member to recognize the patterns before it's too late.

Planting accounting entanglements is a regular pattern. Who ever controls the entanglement (the accountants) controls the people and assets that are entangled. Small numbers are used to make them not worth investigating. As if the issure were the the amount and not that they entangle. The issue is that they entangle.

In this example, $518,903 from the early payoff of a note, disappears behind walls of confusion and conflict created by planting the accounting entanglement $659. Please keep in mind these two trails. Use them as a foundation that you can trust and build upon: 659 = 1,475 - 816 and  518,903 = 545,820 - 26,917

The Note is reported to the Court in the First Estate Account of 9/15/1991- 9/15/1992. It disappears in the second court account without explanation. It is reported to the IRS as if it were still on its original schedule to mature on 4/21/1995. The Truth is that the Note was paid off in full on 4/21/1992.

Reference -
1)  Compare my actual 12th account with the description of it sent to the Judges -  compare   compare74p
2)  $518,903 disappears - http://www.book467page191money.com/545820/note-disappears23p.pdf
3)  659 = 1,475 - 816 - trifecta

$518,903 disappears

This covers up the disappearance of the $518,903

The CPA Joanne L. Barnes did the accounting for the Estate and the Trust.


1992.02.18   (Edward White to Anthony O'Connell, copy to Jean Nader)
(The attorney Edward White and our sister Jean OConnell Nader are co-fiduciaries of our Mother's Estate. I, Anthony Miner OConnell, am Trustee for a testamentary Trust established by our Father's will).
"Re: Estate of Jean M. O'Connell,
Dear Mr. O'Connell,
In order to prepare your mother's 1991 income tax returns, I need the amount that the Harold O'Connell Trust paid her during 1991. In the event the payment was not made in 1991, I will need to file the amount which was due as "income with respect to a decedent" on the estate tax and fiduciary tax returns. The cutoff date for your computation will be September 15, 1991 [Date of our Mother's death]. After that date the trust technically terminated, and the income belongs to the beneficiaries of that trust. 
Jean and I are making progress on the estate. We have decided to leave the A. G. Edwards accounts in place since they are earning a better rate of return than a bank can give. 
I am trying to get to the bottom of the car problem with Sovran and should be able to get the title soon so that it can be transferred to you before the insurance expires.
Jean has informed me that you and your sisters have decided that it is best to try and list the Accotink property at its actual value as of the of death rather than a higher value based on its future value. Since you have worked so diligently on this problem in the past, could you give me the name of an appraiser who could do a valuation which will take into account all of the county inspired problems. It seems to me that the county value of $600,000.00 is too high based on the hurdles you have run into in trying to develop it.
Could you also send me the address of Lynch Properties?
Sincerely, Edward J. White"

1992.02.25 (Edward White to Anthony O'Connell, copy to Jean Nader)
I have received your letter of February 24, 1992 in which you request that I reconsider my refusal to resign as co-executor of your mother's estate. Once more I decline to take such action.
When your mother approached me about changing the co-executors of her will, we discussed the matter at length. She specifically desired to make the changes which are in effect now, and was quite firm in her decision. It would be clearly disloyal of me to dishonor her intentions.
If you are represented, I will be glad to discuss this matter with your counsel.
Sincerely, Edward J. White"


1992.03.30   (Anthony O'Connell to Edward White) (Copy to Jean Nader)
"I have a few questions I hope you would be kind enough to answer.
1. As you know, the Lynch Limited Partnership plans to pay my Mother's estate $545,820.43 on April 21, 1992. What is your best guess as to when and in what amount(s) you will make distribution(s) to the beneficiaries?
2. The license plates on my deceased Mother's Van expire in April of 1992. Virginia DMV requires a new title with the new owners name before they will issue new plates {The plates cannot be renewed by the co-executors signing for Jean O'Connell). The bank will give the co-executors the title if you simply pay them the interest on the loan. I understand the principal on the loan has been paid and I am guessing that the interest is something in the range of $1200 to $1400. Would you please pay the bank the interest so they will give you the title? What is your decision as to who gets the van and how much will it costs?
3. What is your fee for being co-executor of my mother's estate?
Yours truly, Anthony O'Connell"

1992.04.04   Edward White to Anthony O'Connell, copy to Jean Nader)
"I have received your letter of March 30, 1992.
The answers are: 
Question 1. As soon as the money is received, the tax liabilities evaluated and upon consultation with the Co-Executor.
Question 2. Paid. It is not my decision as to what it will cost you, though I have been informed that you know full well.
Question 3.  2 Y % of the receipts into the probate estate if approved by the Commissioner of Accounts.
I would call to your attention that on two separate occasions I drove to Sovran and spent a lengthy period of time on the question of the car loan. I did this in person since: I knew that you had the vehicle, that your sisters wanted you to have it, that the insurance and tags were due to expire soon and I did not want you to be inconvenienced. I could have done all of this by mail and it probably would have taken about three months, knowing the nature of the loan problem. I assumed I was doing you a favor.
Now I receive you letter asking that I "simply pay them the interest" I paid the interest and principal in one check on March 12, received the title on March 22 and mailed it to Mrs. Nader to sign over to you on March 23. Have you any suggestions as to how it could have gone faster?
The information of the commission was given to you previously by Mrs. Nader.
I do not know what your problem is, but in the future, please address all correspondence to Mrs. Nader.  [Fatal].  
I am trying to be patient with you, but I find that this estate is time consuming enough without having to deal with letters such as the last two that I have received.
Sincerely, Edward J. White"

[Fatal]. The lawyer and the CPA hide behind our innocent sister and use her as an unwitting agent.

It is difficult to document secrecy.

For example, my Deed as Trustee for a Virginia Land Trust was ignored. Neither recognized or not recognized. Just ignored. This limbo, this never taking an accounting position by those in control, sabotaged my Trusteeship from day one. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money.
Because of the secrecy, no one recognises the cause and effect. All I can do is show that I asked over and over and over for an accountable position that I could rely upon, and all  I got was silence or a runaround. 
See http://www.book8307page1446deed.com and click "deed ignored" to see the dropdown menu. It's truely amazing.

1992.04.21 The $545,820.43 is paid to our Mother's Estate. It remains concealed.
1992.04.22  (Attorney Edward White to our sister and co-fiduciary Jean Nader. I was not supposed to see a copy of this, but Jean Nader is so innocent she didn't know that early on and sent me a copy.)
"Enclosed is an agreement which should satisfy Tony as to the car. It cannot be any clearer. [It would create an accounting entanglement].
Also enclosed is a preliminary analysis of the estate tax, which should be close to being accurate. I do need to check with Jo Ann Barnes as to a technical question as to whether or not any of your father's trust comes into this. I do not think it does, but there have been many changes in the law since that trust was established. I will have to ask her to bill us for that advice and any other technical tax matters I am not comfortable with. I can do most of the rest of the tax work and save the estate some money.
The executors' commission shown on the analysis is not figured on the value of the realty; however it does not include the 5% commission on the receipts of the estate in addition to the inventory.
In order to file that return and the subsequent Fiduciary Income tax return we will need an accounting from Tony from the date of his last accounting to the date of death. If he does not want to prepare it, I will not agree to any preliminary disbursal to him at all, and will seek your approval to file suit against him to compel the accounting, plus damages to the estate for his delay. Since that trust terminated on your mother's death, his final accounting is due now and not in October.
There will be no further explanations or written entreaties to him as far as I am concerned.He has the duty and he will perform it under a court order if necessary. Of course he will furnish that receipt.

The preliminary analysis contains three alternatives on Accotink at the bottom for your consideration.
In the event that we do seek a reduction in the assessment Tony will be given written notice that his prompt cooperation is necessary and that if he fails to cooperate that he is aware of the adverse consequences to the estate and is responsible for them.
As far as further steps are concerned, we have a lot to do. No gift tax returns were filed for 1989 and 1991 which will have to be done. The results of those gifts are factored in under "Unified Credit used for gifts 9,784".
The paper trail in the court and IRS is as follows:
File Estate tax by June 15, 1992
File First Accounting (16 months after qualification but can be sooner)
Ask for posting of Debts and Demands against the estate.
File Fiduciary Income tax returns for period 9/15/91-9/15/92, due January 1, 1993.
File Motion for a Show Cause why distribution should not be made. Submit Show Cause Order.
Request Executor's exoneration letter from IRS and Virginia.
Obtain closing letter from IRS and Virginia as to estate tax returns.
File 1993 Fiduciary tax returns (Sept. 1992-distribution)
File for Order allowing distribution.
Distribute estate.
File Final Accounting.
Normally distribution is withheld until the Order of Distribution is entered. As I indicated the creditors have one year to press claims against the estate. No prudent executor will distribute before that period, the entry of the Order of Distribution and the receipt of the tax closing letters.
Sincerely, Edward J. White

1)   No mention is made of the $545,820.43 cash payment received the day before.
2)  I believe it is fair to say that any family member trusting and carrying out these instructions will destroy their own family.
3)   The fraudsters use Jean Nader to instruct me. His instructions through her are designed to create accounting entanglements. "5. Since the trust was supposed to terminate on Mother's death, the $2000.00 for the appraisal should be paid to the beneficiaries, not to the trust. The checks from Sheila and me can then be paid back to you. 6. Please send a copy of the appraiser's bill and his notation that it has been paid so that the estate may claim the payment for the appraisal as a deduction.
4)   Mr White encourages Jean Nader to have me taken to Court.
5)  Should you trust the Virginia Bar?
1993.2.10 (Virginia Bar (James McCauley) to Anthony OConnell, in part.)
The Respondent did not file a written answer to your complaint. However, Mr. White is represented by counsel in this matter, David R. Rosenfeld, Esquire, and I met with Mr. Rosenfeld and his associate in Alexandria to go over all of the factual matters related to this complaint
6)   The public should know that the Virginia Bar allows an attorney to tear your family apart to coverup fradulent accounting.
1993.11.01  (Virginia Bar (James McCauley) to Anthony O'Connell, in part)
Finally, you indicate that Mr. White, over a period of seven years, has made defamatory and divisive statements which you consider to be far more damaging than the issue regarding the real estate settlement. The Code of Professional Responsibility does not proscribe defamatory statements by an attorney, and our office is not the appropriate forum to investigate or prosecute your claim. If you feel that you have been defamed or libeled by the Respondent, then your remedy is to file a civil action, but a Bar complaint is not an appropriate vehicle to resolve that issue. (This would mean taking my co-fiduciary sister to Court also).
7) Why is it OK to turn a blind eye to accounting fraudsters tearing families apart to protect themselves? It's been 26 years now.

1992.05.19   (Edward White to Anthony O'Connell, c/o E.A. Prichard, copy to Jean Nader)
"In your letter of May 6 to Jean you asked that I communicate with you with regard to the Harold O'Connell Trust.
I am trying to prepare the estate tax, and as usual in these cases, there are problems trying to understand the flow of debts and income.
I do have a few questions which are put forward simply so that the figures on the Trust's tax returns and accounting will agree with the estate's.
1. The K-1 filed by the Trust for 1991 showed income to your mother of $41,446.00. The Seventh Accounting appears to show a disbursement to her of $40,000.00 plus first half realty taxes paid by the trust for her and thus a disbursal to her of $1794.89. If these two disbursals are added the sum is $41,794.89. This leaves $348.89 which I cannot figure out. It could well be a disbursal of principal and not taxable.
2. The K-1 filed by the Trust showed a payment of $816.00 in interest to the estate. You sent a check in the amount of $1475.97 to the estate. What was the remaining $659.97? Do I have this confused with the tax debt/credit situation which ran from the Third Accounting?
3. On the Seventh Accounting "Income per 7th Account" is shown as $5181.71, but I cannot figure that one out either.
I am of the opinion that the estate owes the trust for the second half real estate taxes from September 15, 1991 through December 31, 1991 in the amount of $1052.35. This is shown on your accounting a disbursed to the heirs. Should this be paid back to the heirs or to the Trust?
I believe that the income received from the savings accounts from September 15 to the date the various banks made their next payment to the Trust (9/30 and 9/21) should be split on a per diem basis, since the Trust terminated on her death. This will be a small amount of course.
Are there any other debts which your Mother owed the Trust?
I realize that Jo Ann Barnes prepared this and if you authorize it I can ask her to help me out.
Please understand that I have no problem with the Accounting, I m just trying to match things up. In the long run, since the beneficiaries are the same, the matter is academic. Please send the bill for the appraisal whenever you receive it. Jean is filing the Fairfax form for re-assessment in her capacity as a co-owner in order to give us a better basis to get this assessment changed and to meet the county's deadline. It will state that the appraisal you have ordered will follow. I think this will be to all of your benefit in the long run.
Sincerely, Edward J. White"
(Comment: The CPA Joanne L. Barnes did the accounting for the Estate and the Trust. The Attorney Edward White frames me with the CPA's accounting. Such as planting the accounting entanglement 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97)

2000.7.24  About 11 months after I submitted my 12th Trust Account and got no response, I wrote the Judges.

2000.08.08  Link -http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/518903/true_false52p.pdf
Compare my actual 12th account with the Comissioner of Account's version of it to the Judges.

$659.97 issue.
The issue of the $659.97 is not the amount. The issue is that it entangles.
Small amounts are used to create the entanglements to make them
appear as not worth investigating, as if the amount were the issue.
Is there really not one leader who would recognize 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97,
or say why it should not be recognized?

Commissioner Wilson did not initial or date his change.
So it looks as if I made the change. This is against the law.


The fraudsters have Jean Nader sign a complaint that says I should be removed as Trustee for trying to expose the accounting trail 1,475 - 816 = 659

(above) Page 7 of the Complaint
(below) Comments on page 7


"28. Other than its status as beneficiary of the Land Trust, there is no reason for the continuation of the Harold Trust.
(Comment: My Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report for this account disappeared after being received by the Court on August 23, 2012.)

29. On August 8, 2000, an Eleventh Account for the Harold Trust was approved by the Commissioner of Accounts for the Circuit Court of Fairfax County and determined to be a final account.
(Comment: Commisioner Wilson did not sign or date his change to my 11th account so it looks as if I did it. This is against the law.)
(Comment: Who determined it? Did they recognize the 659 trail 1,475-816 = 659? If not, what trail did they recognize for the 659? Did they recognize the 518,903 trail 518,903 -26,917 = 518,903 where $518,903 disappeared?)

30. Anthony repeatedly and unsuccessfully challenged the Commissioner's determination and requested, inter alia, that the Court and the Commissioner of Accounts investigate a debt of $659.97 that he alleged was owed to the Harold Trust by Mrs. O'Connell's estate. In these proceedings, the Commissioner stated, and the court agreed, that there was no evidence to support Anthony's claims that a debt existed and, if so, that it was an asset of the Harold Trust.
(Comment: The issue is not the amount. My actual 12th account clearly shows that the issue is that the 659 creates an accounting entanglement. The issue is not the amount. The accountants use small numbrers to create the accounting entanglements to make them appear unworthy of investigastion. As if the issue were the amount.)

31. Anthony's repeated and unsuccessful challenges to the rulings of the Commissioner of Accounts and the Circuit Court in connection with the Eleventh Account, and his persistence in pursuing his unfounded claims to the present day, demonstrate that he is unable to administer the Harold Trust effectively and reliably. ***
(Comment - Not recognizing the accounting trail 1,475 - 816 = 659 is a cover up. Not recognizing the accounting trail 545,820 - 26,917 = 518,903 is a coverup. Why is the CPA-attorney team not held accountable? Framing the Trustee for their fraudulent accounting is a coverup. Removing the Trustee for trying to expose their accounting is a coverup.)

32. It is in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust that, upon the sale of the Property, the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner. Based on Anthony's actions, he is not the proper individual to fulfill the trustee's duties in administering the Harold Trust.
(Comment: This means, I believe, don't look at the acounting closely.)

33. The removal of Anthony as trustee best serves the interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust.


Isn't this guilty until proven innocent?

Is there not one leader in Virginia who would recognize that seventeen (17) of my eighteen (18) responses to the Complaint against me disappeared after being received by the Court?

 1   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/1-545820-23p.pdf
 2   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/2-bk467p191-8p.pdf
 3   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/3-blueprint4p.pdf
 4   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/4-canweconnectthedots2p.pdf
 5   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/5-codeofconduct18p.pdf
 6   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/6-commitments-Individually8p.pdf
 7   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/7-compute-tax-test35p.pdf
 8   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/8-exceptions1994disappeared.pdf
 9   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/9-exceptions2000disappeared.pdf
10  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/10-overview72p.pdf                          (Includes complete Deed) 11  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/11-percentages12p.pdf       
12  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/12-precedence17p.pdf
13  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/13-tax-records94p.pdf
14  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/14-trust-deed-invisible175p.pdf       (Includes complete Deed)
15 www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/15-trust-documents42p.pdf              (Includes complete Deed) 16  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/16-unknown14p.pdf                         (Includes first 3 pages of Deed) 17  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/17-usingIRS15p.pdf       

      www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/all-18responses714p.pdf                  (Includes multiple copies of Deed)   

Complaint - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/complaint60p.pdf
My responses - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/all18responses714p.pdf
My email verifying 18 responses - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/email-verifying18responses3p.pdf
Order - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/order5p.pdf

Invisible Deed

My Trusteeship was sabotaged from day one. Believe it or not, and I still can't image how they did it, the whole Court ignored my Deed as Trustee without explanation. This blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Not one leader recogized this cause and effect.



http://www.canweconnectthedots.com         (Best reference)
http://www.tucsonva.com                   (How big and protected are they?)